Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm a fast-talkin' hell-raisin' son of a bitch, and I'm a sinner and I know how to fight
The Others
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(279)
-
▼
February
(35)
- Frustrated. Upset. Shedding a few tears.
- Today's news
- You rock, Gary Brolsma!
- Swoon.
- Prisoner murdered on prison bus
- Text msg battle: the aftermath.
- Hey there!
- In legal news
- Riddle me this
- untitled
- Handed down today: Smith vs. Massachusetts. A de...
- SO BORED
- reservations
- identity
- I may hate myself in the morning, but I'm gonna lo...
- Love the kiddos
- untitled
- Orange and Limericks
- news flash
- HOLY STRING OF CURSES
- Thanks to a link from Arbitrary & Capricious, I go...
- Free! Help yourself!
- It is what it is.
- every bus needs a public defender.
- Slate commentary on the Lynne Stewart verdict.
- Bullshit sentencing.
- Grammy commentary
- I'm doing research for my capital client and just ...
- every bus needs a public defender
- Another pointless execution
- Decimated
- I am weary.
- this must be my lucky day
- further proof that I am not actually sane
- update
-
▼
February
(35)
2 comments:
C Dog: I haven't followed this, so I can't commend specifically on it. Regarding this regulation she allegedly violated--can you be imprisoned for violating regulations???? I can't understand the regulation crime. I can somewhat understand the press release in Egypt one. For instance, if I leave prison after meeting with my client and tell his brother, or one of his gang members, that they really should kill a potential witness, I would certainly expect to be prosecuted myself. The "sheik no longer supports a cease fire" could be a helluva lot more dangerous, I'd imagine.
Silly CDog. No one gets prosecuted for violating rules - they get prosecuted for LYING about violating rules. My understanding of the Lynne Stewart debacle is that she was prosecuted for breaking her promise to the government - conspiring to defraud or perjury or something - and aiding terrorism.
Post a Comment